Videogame Agency as a Bio-costs Contract
AbstractThis paper presents a novel descriptive model for agency in videogames as communication. Literature pertaining to interactive works including videogames has identified the need to overcome dyadic perspectives of communication in such works. Research specifically to do with agency has called for agency to no longer be confused with freedom of action, for an integrated perspective of the player and the system, and for that relationship to be viewed as a conversation. The transactional model in this paper achieves this by proposing a nested hierarchy of levels of communication that operate as an implicit contract, negotiated between the system and the player, where the object of the transaction is bio-costs, effected through the signalling of the attainability of understandings. The paper describes research antecedents, a research agenda, the basis for the model, the model itself, examples of how the model can be used to describe videogame designs, and future research.
Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Adams, E. (2006). A New Vision for Interactive Stories. Lecture delivered at the Game Developers' Conference, San Francisco, California, USA.
Adams, E. (2013). Resolutions to some problems in interactive storytelling. Teeside University, Middlesborough, England, UK.
Carvalhais, M., & Cardoso, P. (2017). Creation of meaning in processor-based artefacts. ISEA 2017: International Symposium on Electronic Arts, Manizales, Colombia.
Dubberly, H., Maupin, C., & Pangaro, P. (2009). Bio-cost An Economics of Human Behavior. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 16(3–4), 187–194.
Fallout 2 [Computer Game]. (1998). Irvine: Interplay Productions, Inc.
Harrell, D. F. F., & Zhu, J. (2009). Agency play: Dimensions of agency for interactive narrative design. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2009 Spring Symposium on Narrative Intelligence II. Menlo Park: AAAI Press (pp. 44–52). Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2009/SS-09-06/SS09-06-008.pdf.
Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. AAAI-04 Workshop on Challenges in Game AI (Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 17-22).
Louchart, S., Swartjes, I., Kriegel, M., & Aylett, R. (2008). Purposeful authoring for emergent narrative. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5334 LNCS, pp. 273–284). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89454-4_35.
Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press., pp. 273–284). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89454-4_35
Pangaro, P. (2002). New order from old: The rise of second-order cybernetics and implications for machine intelligence. American Society for Cybernetics in Vancouver.
Pangaro, P. (2008). Instructions for design and designs for conversation. In Handbook of conversation design for instructional applications (pp. 35-48). IGI Global.
Pask, G. (1976). Conversation Theory - Applications in Education and Epistemology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Red Faction: Guerrilla [Computer Game]. (2009). Agoura Hills: THQ Inc.
Tanenbaum, K., & Tanenbaum, J. (2010). Agency as commitment to meaning: communicative competence in games. Digital Creativity, 21(1), 11–17. http://doi.org/10.1080/14626261003654509.
Upton, B. 2018. Situational game design. CRC Press.
Wardrip-Fruin, N., Mateas, M., Dow, S., & Sali, S. (2009). Agency Reconsidered. Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/09287.41281.pdf.
Watzlawick, P., & Beavin, J. H. (1967). Some formal aspects of communication. The American Behavioral Scientist, 10(8), 4–8.
Young, R. M. (2002). The Cooperative Contract in Interactive Entertainment. In Socially Intelligent Agents (pp. 229–234).
Authors who publish in the CITAR Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Copyrights to illustrations published in the journal remain with their current copyright holders.
It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission to quote from copyright sources.
Any fees required to obtain illustrations or to secure copyright permissions are the responsibility of authors.