Antagonism and Mutual Dependency. Critial Models of Performance and “Piano Interpretation Schools”

Rui Cruz, Sofia Lourenço

 
   

Abstract


To polarize and, coincidently, intersect two different concepts, in terms of a distinction/analogy between “piano interpretation schools” and “critical models” is the aim of this paper. The former, with its prior connotations of both empiricism and dogmatism and not directly shaped by aesthetic criteria or interpretational ideals, depends mainly on the aural and oral tradition as well the teacher-student legacy; the latter employs ideally the generic criteria of interpretativeness, which can be measured in accordance to an aesthetic formula and can include features such as non-obviousness, inferentially, lack of consensus, concern with meaning or significance, concern with structure or design, etc. The relative autonomy of the former is a challenge to the latter, which embraces the range of perspectives available in the horizon of the history of ideas about music and interpretation. The effort of recognizing models of criticism within musical interpretation creates the vehicle for new understandings of the nature and the historical development of Western classical piano performance, promoting also the production of quality critical argument and the communication of key performance tendencies and styles.

Keywords


Critical Models;Aesthetic Consciousness;Piano Interpretation Schools;Performance;Interpretation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno T. W. (2005). Critical Models, Interventions and Catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press.

Bazzana K. (1997). Glenn Gould. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Campbell E. (2010). Boulez, Music and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Danuser H. (1992). Musikalische interpretation. In H. Danuser (ed.), Bd 11 of Neues Handbuch der Musikwissenschaft. Laaber: Laaber-Verlag.

Kramer L. (2010). Interpreting Music. Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: 10.1525/california/9780520267053.001.0001

Levinson J. (1993) Performative vs. critical interpretation. In M. Kraus (ed.), The Interpretation of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lourenço S. (2005). As escolas de piano europeias: Tendências nacionais de interpretação pianística no século XX. Doctoral Dissertation, Évora: Universidade de Évora.

Lourenço S. (2007) Tendencies of piano interpretation in the 20th-century: Concept and different types of “piano interpretation schools”. In A. Williamson and D. Coimbra (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science 2007 (pp. 187-192). Utrecht, The Netherlands: European Association of Conservatoires (AEC).

Lourenço S. (2010). European piano schools, Russian, German, French: Classical piano interpretation and technique. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 2, pp. 6-14. doi: 10.7559/citarj.v2i1.7

O’Dea J. (2000). Virtue or Virtuosity? Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Payzant G. (1984). Glenn Gould. Toronto: Key Porter Books.

Rattalino P. (2001). Le Grandi Scuole Pianistiche (2nd ed.). Milan, Italy: Casa Ricordi – BMG Ricordi S.p.A.

Schonberg H. (1987). The Great Pianists. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.

Scruton R. (1983). The Aesthetic Understanding. London: Taylor & Francis.

Sundin N-G. (1994). Aesthetic Criteria for Musical Interpretation. Jyväskyla: University of Jyväskyla.

Thom P. (2007). The Musician as Interpreter. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v3i1.30

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts
Revista de Ciência e Tecnologia das Artes
ISSN: 1646-9798
e-ISSN: 2183-0088
Portuguese Catholic University | Porto

    

Esta revista científica é financiada por Fundos Nacionais através da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia


 Governo da República Portuguesa