Agency and Algorithms
AbstractAlthough the concept of algorithms has been established a long time ago, their current topicality indicates a shift in the discourse. Classical definitions based on logic seem to be inadequate to describe their aesthetic capabilities. New approaches stress their involvement in material practices as well as their incompleteness. Algorithmic aesthetics can no longer be tied to the static analysis of programs, but must take into account the dynamic and experimental nature of coding practices. It is suggested that the aesthetic objects thus produced articulate something that could be called algorithmicity or the space of algorithmic agency. This is the space or the medium – following Luhmann’s form/medium distinction – where human and machine undergo mutual incursions. In the resulting coupled “extimate” writing process, human initiative and algorithmic speculation cannot be clearly divided out any longer. An observation is attempted of defining aspects of such a medium by drawing a trajectory across a number of sound pieces. The operation of exchange between form and medium I call reconfiguration and it is indicated by this trajectory.
Baecker, D. (1996). A Note on Composition. Systems Research, 13, 195–203.
Blass, A. & Gurevich, Y. (2003). Algorithms: a quest for absolute definitions. Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science (EATCS), 81, 195–225.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Di Scipio, A. (1998). Compositional Models in Xenakis's Electroacoustic Music. Perspectives of New Music, 36(2), 201–243. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/833529
Gurevich, Y. (2012). What is an algorithm? In International conference on current trends in theory and practice of computer science (pp. 31–42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-642-27660-6_3
Kleinman, A. (2012). Intra-actions: an interview with Karen Barad. Mousse Magazine, (34), 76–81.
Kowalski, R. (1979). Algorithm = logic + control. Communications of the ACM, 22(7), 424–436.
Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Parisi, L. (2013). Contagious architecture: computation, aesthetics, and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rheinberger, H.-J. (1994). Experimental Systems: Historiality, Narration, and Deconstruction. Science in Context, 7 (1), 65–81.
Rheinberger, H.-J. (1998). Experimental systems, graphematic spaces. In T. Lenoir (Ed.), Inscribing science: scientific texts and the materiality of communication (pp. 285–303). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Rheinberger, H.-J. (2011). Pfropfen in Experimentalsystemen. In U. Wirth (Ed.), Impfen, Pfropfen, Transplantieren (pp. 65–74). Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.
Rheinberger, H.-J. (2013). Forming and Being Informed: Hans-Jörg Rheinberger in conversation with Michael Schwab. In M. Schwab (Ed.), Experimental systems. future knowledge in artistic research (pp. 198–219). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Rutz, H. H. (2012). Sound Similarity as Interface between Human and Machine in Electroacoustic Composition. In Proceedings of the 38th international computer music conference (pp. 212–219). Ljubljana. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.bbp2372.2012.039
Rutz, H. H. (2014a). Sound processes: a new computer music framework. In Proceedings of the joint 11th sound and music computing conference and the 40th international computer music conference (pp. 1618–1626). Athens. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.bbp2372.2014.245
Rutz, H. H. (2014b). Tracing the compositional process. sound art that rewrites its own past: formation, praxis and a computer framework (Doctoral dissertation, Plymouth University, UK). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3116
Schwab, M. (Ed.). (2013). Experimental systems. future knowledge in artistic research. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Spencer-Brown, G. (1979). Laws of Form. New York: E.P. Dutton. (Original work published 1969)
von Foerster, H. (2003). For Niklas Luhmann: How Recursive is Communication? (R. Howe, Trans.). In, Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition (pp. 305–323). New York: Springer.
Authors who publish in the CITAR Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Copyrights to illustrations published in the journal remain with their current copyright holders.
It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission to quote from copyright sources.
Any fees required to obtain illustrations or to secure copyright permissions are the responsibility of authors.