Agency and Algorithms

  • Hanns Holger Rutz Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics (IEM) University of Music and Performing Arts, Graz, Austria
Keywords: Algorithms, Agency, Process, Differential Reproduction.

Abstract

Although the concept of algorithms has been established a long time ago, their current topicality indicates a shift in the discourse. Classical definitions based on logic seem to be inadequate to describe their aesthetic capabilities. New approaches stress their involvement in material practices as well as their incompleteness. Algorithmic aesthetics can no longer be tied to the static analysis of programs, but must take into account the dynamic and experimental nature of coding practices. It is suggested that the aesthetic objects thus produced articulate something that could be called algorithmicity or the space of algorithmic agency. This is the space or the medium – following Luhmann’s form/medium distinction – where human and machine undergo mutual incursions. In the resulting coupled “extimate” writing process, human initiative and algorithmic speculation cannot be clearly divided out any longer. An observation is attempted of defining aspects of such a medium by drawing a trajectory across a number of sound pieces. The operation of exchange between form and medium I call reconfiguration and it is indicated by this trajectory. 

Author Biography

Hanns Holger Rutz, Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics (IEM) University of Music and Performing Arts, Graz, Austria
Hanns Holger Rutz (*1977 in Germany) is a sound artist, composer, performer, researcher and software developer in electronic art. He studied computer music and audio engineering at the Electronic Studio of the TU Berlin, and from 2004–2009 worked at the Studio for electroacoustic Music (SeaM) Weimar. In 2014, he completed a PhD at the Interdisciplinary Centre for Computer Music Research (ICCMR) in Plymouth (UK). His artistic work, mainly comprised of sound and intermedia installation, live improvisation and electroacoustic composition, has been internationally exhibited, performed and awarded. In his works, the development and research on software and algorithms plays an important role. The central theme in the recent works is the materiality of writing processes. He currently holds a position as post-doc researcher at the Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics (IEM), Graz.

References

Baecker, D. (1996). A Note on Composition. Systems Research, 13, 195–203.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1735(199609)13:3

Blass, A. & Gurevich, Y. (2003). Algorithms: a quest for absolute definitions. Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science (EATCS), 81, 195–225.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Di Scipio, A. (1998). Compositional Models in Xenakis's Electroacoustic Music. Perspectives of New Music, 36(2), 201–243. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/833529

https://doi.org/10.2307/833529

Gurevich, Y. (2012). What is an algorithm? In International conference on current trends in theory and practice of computer science (pp. 31–42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-642-27660-6_3

Kleinman, A. (2012). Intra-actions: an interview with Karen Barad. Mousse Magazine, (34), 76–81.

Kowalski, R. (1979). Algorithm = logic + control. Communications of the ACM, 22(7), 424–436.

https://doi.org/10.1145/359131.359136

Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Parisi, L. (2013). Contagious architecture: computation, aesthetics, and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (1994). Experimental Systems: Historiality, Narration, and Deconstruction. Science in Context, 7 (1), 65–81.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889700001599

Rheinberger, H.-J. (1998). Experimental systems, graphematic spaces. In T. Lenoir (Ed.), Inscribing science: scientific texts and the materiality of communication (pp. 285–303). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (2011). Pfropfen in Experimentalsystemen. In U. Wirth (Ed.), Impfen, Pfropfen, Transplantieren (pp. 65–74). Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (2013). Forming and Being Informed: Hans-Jörg Rheinberger in conversation with Michael Schwab. In M. Schwab (Ed.), Experimental systems. future knowledge in artistic research (pp. 198–219). Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Rutz, H. H. (2012). Sound Similarity as Interface between Human and Machine in Electroacoustic Composition. In Proceedings of the 38th international computer music conference (pp. 212–219). Ljubljana. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.bbp2372.2012.039

Rutz, H. H. (2014a). Sound processes: a new computer music framework. In Proceedings of the joint 11th sound and music computing conference and the 40th international computer music conference (pp. 1618–1626). Athens. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.bbp2372.2014.245

Rutz, H. H. (2014b). Tracing the compositional process. sound art that rewrites its own past: formation, praxis and a computer framework (Doctoral dissertation, Plymouth University, UK). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3116

Schwab, M. (Ed.). (2013). Experimental systems. future knowledge in artistic research. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Spencer-Brown, G. (1979). Laws of Form. New York: E.P. Dutton. (Original work published 1969)

von Foerster, H. (2003). For Niklas Luhmann: How Recursive is Communication? (R. Howe, Trans.). In, Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition (pp. 305–323). New York: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21722-3_15

Published
2016-11-30