Agency and Algorithms

Hanns Holger Rutz

 
   

Abstract


Although the concept of algorithms has been established a long time ago, their current topicality indicates a shift in the discourse. Classical definitions based on logic seem to be inadequate to describe their aesthetic capabilities. New approaches stress their involvement in material practices as well as their incompleteness. Algorithmic aesthetics can no longer be tied to the static analysis of programs, but must take into account the dynamic and experimental nature of coding practices. It is suggested that the aesthetic objects thus produced articulate something that could be called algorithmicity or the space of algorithmic agency. This is the space or the medium – following Luhmann’s form/medium distinction – where human and machine undergo mutual incursions. In the resulting coupled “extimate” writing process, human initiative and algorithmic speculation cannot be clearly divided out any longer. An observation is attempted of defining aspects of such a medium by drawing a trajectory across a number of sound pieces. The operation of exchange between form and medium I call reconfiguration and it is indicated by this trajectory. 


Keywords


Algorithms; Agency; Process; Differential Reproduction.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baecker, D. (1996). A Note on Composition. Systems Research, 13, 195–203.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1735(199609)13:3

Blass, A. & Gurevich, Y. (2003). Algorithms: a quest for absolute definitions. Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science (EATCS), 81, 195–225.

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Di Scipio, A. (1998). Compositional Models in Xenakis's Electroacoustic Music. Perspectives of New Music, 36(2), 201–243. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/833529

https://doi.org/10.2307/833529

Gurevich, Y. (2012). What is an algorithm? In International conference on current trends in theory and practice of computer science (pp. 31–42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-642-27660-6_3

Kleinman, A. (2012). Intra-actions: an interview with Karen Barad. Mousse Magazine, (34), 76–81.

Kowalski, R. (1979). Algorithm = logic + control. Communications of the ACM, 22(7), 424–436.

https://doi.org/10.1145/359131.359136

Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Parisi, L. (2013). Contagious architecture: computation, aesthetics, and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (1994). Experimental Systems: Historiality, Narration, and Deconstruction. Science in Context, 7 (1), 65–81.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889700001599

Rheinberger, H.-J. (1998). Experimental systems, graphematic spaces. In T. Lenoir (Ed.), Inscribing science: scientific texts and the materiality of communication (pp. 285–303). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (2011). Pfropfen in Experimentalsystemen. In U. Wirth (Ed.), Impfen, Pfropfen, Transplantieren (pp. 65–74). Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.

Rheinberger, H.-J. (2013). Forming and Being Informed: Hans-Jörg Rheinberger in conversation with Michael Schwab. In M. Schwab (Ed.), Experimental systems. future knowledge in artistic research (pp. 198–219). Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Rutz, H. H. (2012). Sound Similarity as Interface between Human and Machine in Electroacoustic Composition. In Proceedings of the 38th international computer music conference (pp. 212–219). Ljubljana. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.bbp2372.2012.039

Rutz, H. H. (2014a). Sound processes: a new computer music framework. In Proceedings of the joint 11th sound and music computing conference and the 40th international computer music conference (pp. 1618–1626). Athens. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.bbp2372.2014.245

Rutz, H. H. (2014b). Tracing the compositional process. sound art that rewrites its own past: formation, praxis and a computer framework (Doctoral dissertation, Plymouth University, UK). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3116

Schwab, M. (Ed.). (2013). Experimental systems. future knowledge in artistic research. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Spencer-Brown, G. (1979). Laws of Form. New York: E.P. Dutton. (Original work published 1969)

von Foerster, H. (2003). For Niklas Luhmann: How Recursive is Communication? (R. Howe, Trans.). In, Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition (pp. 305–323). New York: Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21722-3_15




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v8i1.223

Cited by

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts
Revista de Ciência e Tecnologia das Artes
ISSN: 1646-9798
e-ISSN: 2183-0088
Portuguese Catholic University | Porto


Esta revista científica é financiada por Fundos Nacionais através da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia


 Governo da República Portuguesa