Overcoming Information Aesthetics: In Defense of a Non-Quantitative Informational Understanding of Artworks
AbstractAttempts to describe aesthetic artefacts through informational models have existed at least since the late 1950s; but they have not been as successful as their proponents expected nor are they popular among art scholars because of their (mostly) quantitative nature. However, given how information technology has deeply shifted every aspect of our world, it is fair to ask whether aesthetic value continues to be immune to informational interpretations. This paper discusses the ideas of the late Russian biophysicist, Mikhail Volkenstein concerning art and aesthetic value. It contrasts them with Max Bense’s ‘information aesthetics’, and with contemporary philosophical understandings of information. Overall, this paper shows that an informational but not necessarily quantitative approach serves not only as an effective means to describe our interaction with artworks, but also contributes to explain why purely quantitative models struggle to formalise aesthetic value. Finally, it makes the case that adopting an informational outlook helps overcome the ‘analogue vs digital’ dichotomy by arguing the distinction is epistemological rather than ontological, and therefore the two notions need not be incompatible.
Adriaans, P., & Van Benthem, J. (2008). Introduction: Information is what information does. In P. Adriaans & J. Van Benthem (Eds.), Philosophy of information (Vol. 8, pp. 7–29). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ben-Naim, A. (2007). Entropy demystified: The second law reduced to plain common sense. Singapore: World Scientific.
Ben-Naim, A. (2008). A farewell to entropy: Statistical thermodynamics based on information. Singapore: World Scientific.
Birkhoff, G. D. (1933). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Byfield, T. (2008). Information. In M. Fuller (Ed.), Software studies: A lexicon (pp. 125–132). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Cohen, H., Nake, F., Brown, D. C., Brown, P., Galanter, P., McCormack, J., & d'Inverno, M. (2012). Evaluation of creative aesthetics. In J. McCormack & M. d'Inverno (Eds.), Computers and creativity (pp. 95–111). Berlin; New York: Springer.
Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. Massachusetts; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Floridi, L. (2004). Information. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information (Vol. 14, pp. 40–61). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Floridi, L. (2010). Information a very short introduction. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2011a). A defence of constructionism: Philosophy as conceptual engineering. Metaphilosophy, 42(3), 282–304.
Floridi, L. (2011b). The philosophy of information. England: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2016). Semantic conceptions of information. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/information-semantic/
Gleick, J. (2011a). Genius: The life and science of Richard Feynman. New York: Open Road Media.
Gleick, J. (2011b). The information: A history, a theory, a flood. New York: Pantheon Books.
Greenberg, C. (1999). Towards a newer Laocoon: An anthology of changing ideas. In C. Harrison & P. Wood (Eds.), Art in theory 1900–1990 (12th reprint, pp. 554–560). Blackwell Publishing.
Klütsch, C. (2012). Information aesthetics and the Stuttgart school. In H. B. Higgins & D. Kahn (Eds.), Mainframe experimentalism: Early computing and the foundations of the digital arts (pp. 65–89). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mainzer, K. (2004). System: An introduction to systems science. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of computing and information (pp. 28–39). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Mignonneau, L., & Sommerer, C. (2006). From the poesy of programming to research as art form. In P. A. Fishwick (Ed.), Aesthetic computing (pp. 169–183). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Nake, F. (2012). Construction and intuition: Creativity in early computer art. In J. McCormack & M. d'Inverno (Eds.), Computers and creativity (pp. 61–94). Berlin; New York: Springer.
Rigau, J., Feixas, M., & Sbert, M. (2008). Informational aesthetics measures. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28(2), 24–34.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656. Reprinted with corrections.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1980). The mathematical theory of communication (8th ed.). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House.
Volkenstein, M. V. (2009). Entropy and information. (A. B. de Monvel & G. Kaiser, Eds., A. Shenitzer & R. G. Burns, Trans.). Berlin: Birkhäuser.
Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematics of communication. Scientific American, 181(1), 11–15.
Wiener, N. (1985). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine (2d ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Authors who publish in the CITAR Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Copyrights to illustrations published in the journal remain with their current copyright holders.
It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission to quote from copyright sources.
Any fees required to obtain illustrations or to secure copyright permissions are the responsibility of authors.