Robots and Cultural Heritage: New Museum Experiences
AbstractThe introduction of new technologies to enhance the visiting museum experience is not a novelty. A large variety of interactive systems are nowadays available, including virtual tours, which makes cultural heritage accessible remotely. The theme of increase in accessibility and attractiveness has lately been faced with the employment of the service robotics, covering various types of applications. Regrettably, many of robotics solutions appear less successful in terms of utility and usability. On the basis of this awareness, a design for a new robotic solution for cultural heritage has been proposed. The project, developed at the royal residence of Racconigi Castle, consists of a telepresence robot designed as a tool to explore inaccessible areas of the heritage. The employed robot, called Virgil, was expressly designed for the project. The control of the robot is entrusted to the museum guides in order to enhance their work and enrich the cultural storytelling.
Alvarez, M., Galan, R., Matia, F., Rodriguez- Losada, D., & Jimenez, A. (2010) An emotional model for a guide robot. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: System and Humans, Vol. 40, No. 5, September.
Barile, S. & Saviano, M. (2012) From the management of Cultural Heritage to the governance of Cultural Heritage system (in Italian). Patrimonio culturale e creazione di valore, Verso nuovi percorsi, Cedam.
Beacham, R., Denard, H., & Niccolucci, F. (2006) An introduction to the London charter. The E- volution of the ICTechnology in Cultural Heritage, Joint Event CIPA/VAST/EG/EuroMed Event.
Bisol, B., Carnevalle, A., & Lucivero, F. (2014) Human rights, values and new technologies. The case of robotic ethics in Europe (in Italian). Metodo, International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, 2(1).
CSIRO (2015) Telepresence robot for museums. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia.
http://www.csiro.au/Organisation-Structure/Flagships/Digital-Productivity-and- Services-Flagship/Smart-secure- infrastructure/MuseumRobot-Case-study.aspx (retrieved 12 March 2015).
D. M. (2001) Document of guidelines on technical and scientific criteria and on standard of functioning and development of museums (in Italian). Art. 150, comma 6, del D.L. no. 112, 1998. G.U. October 19, no. 244, S. O.
Droids Company (2015) http://www.droids- company.com/droidlomnynorio/index.html (retrieved 12 March 2015).
Epstein, S. L. (2015) Wanted: collaborative intelligences. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 221, April. Elsevier.
Ermacora G., Toma A., Rosa S., (2015), Fly4SmartCity: a Cloud Robotics Service for Smart City applications”, (submitted at Journal of Ambient Intelligent and Smart Environments).
Falconer, J. (2013) Honda’s ASIMO get a new job at museum. IEEE Spectrum, 9 July. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/human oids/honda-asimo-humanoid-robot-gets-new-job-at- museum (retrieved 28 June 2015)
Germak, C. (2014) from the interview of Strappavecchia, M. C. Robotics at museums (in Italian). L’indro, 17 November. http://www.lindro.it/0-cultura/2014-11-17/158271-robotica-musei (retrieved 12 March 2015).
Guizzo, E. (2011) Cloud Robotics: Connected to the cloud, Robot get smarter, IEEE Spectrum, http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/robotics- software/cloud robotics (retrieved 24 January 2011).
Hogan, T., Goveas, D., Noonan, R., & Twomey, L. (2015) Tarascope: controlling remote telescope through tangible interaction. TEI’15, January 16– 19, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ippoliti, E. (2011) Digital media for the cultural heritage fruition (in Italian). Disegnarecon, 4(8).
ISO (2011) Ergonomics of human-system interaction – guidance on World Wide Web user interfaces. ISO 9241-151:2008, 17 September.
Istat (2013) Museums, Archeological Areas and Monuments in Italy. Socio-demographic and Environmental Statistics Directorate, Italy, 5 December. http://www.istat.it/en/archive/106183 (retrieved 28 June 2015).
Macaluso, I., Ardizzone, E., Chella, A., Cossentino, M., Gentile, A., Gradino, R., Infantino, I., Liotta, M., Rizzo, R., & Scardino, G. (2005) Experiences with cicerobot, a museum guide cognitive robot. Advances in Artificial Intelligences, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3673. Springer.
McDonnell, I. (2001) The role of the tour guide in transferring cultural understanding. Working Paper No. 3, School of Leisure, Sport and Tourism, Sydney, Australia.
Nourbakhsh, I., Bobenage, J., Grange, S., Lutz, R., Meyer, R., & Soto, A. (1999) An affective mobile robot educator with a full-time job. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 114, Elsevier.
Oiron (2015) Norio: Un robot pour entrer dans l’histoire (in French). Château d’Oiron, National Centre for Monuments, France. http://www.oiron.fr/norio-robot-de-visite.html (retrieved 12 March 2015).
Pirrelli, M. (2012) The hidden art deposits (in Italian). Commenti&Inchieste, Il Sole 24 Ore. http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/commenti-e-idee/2012-03-30/giacimenti-nascosti-arte- 064018.shtml?uuid=AbIDg9FF (retrieved 12 March 2015).
Proctor, N. (2011) The Google Art Project: a new generation of museums on the web? Curator: The Museum Journal, 54(2), April.
Quigley, M., Conley, K., Gerkey, B., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., Berger E., Wheeler R. e Ng, A. Y. (2009, May). ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System. In ICRA workshop on open source software (Vol. 3, No. 3.2, p. 5).
Salvini, P., Laschi, C., & Dario, P. (2010) Design for acceptability: improving robots’ coexistence in human society. International Journal of Social Robotics, Springer.
Schraft, R. D., Graf, B., Traub, A., & John, D. (2001) A mobile robot platform for assistance and entertainment. International Journal of Industrial Robot, 28(1). MCB University Press.
Suchy, S. (2006) Museum management: emotional value and community engagement. Intercom 2006, 2–4 November, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sylaiou, S., Killintzis, V., Paliokas, I., Mania, K., & Patias, P. (2014) Usability evaluation of virtual museums’ interfaces visualization technologies. VAMR 2014, Part II, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8526. Springer.
Tate (2015) After Dark. Tate Britain, London, UK. http://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-britain/special- event/after-dark (retrieved 12 March 2015).
Thrun, S., Bennewitz, M., Burgard, W., Cremers, A. B., Dellaert, F., Fox, D., Hahnel, D., Rosenberg, C., Roy, N., Schulte, J., & Schulz, D. (1999) Minerva: a tour-guide robot that learns. KI-99, Advances in Artificial Intelligences, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1701. Springer.
Tresset, P. A., & Laymarie, F. F. (2012) Sketches by Paul the robot. In D. Cunningham & D. House (eds.), Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging.
Willeke T., Kunz C., Nourbakhsh I., (2001) The history of the Mobot museum robot series: an evolutionary study. Flairs – 01. Proceedings, AAAI.
Authors who publish in the CITAR Journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Copyrights to illustrations published in the journal remain with their current copyright holders.
It is the author's responsibility to obtain permission to quote from copyright sources.
Any fees required to obtain illustrations or to secure copyright permissions are the responsibility of authors.