Repetitions, dichotomies and transference in European cinema of the 20s

  • Alexandra Serapicos Escola das Artes Universidade Católica Portuguesa

Abstract

Warning Regarding the films under analysis, only words by their authors are used as references. There is, therefore, a deliberate 'disinterest' in other people's opinions. Authors do not always tell everything, sometimes they distort the order of things and facts themselves (not always to their own advantage), but even their 'lies' offer us clues, if not to the final significance, at least for their intentions and wishes - for the project. I think that one's own work and words are (almost) always the best point of departure for personal reflection, even if it results in already explored or proposed paths. This warning is justified because there are countless analyses, particularly of Eisenstein's Potemkin, openly ignored here. This is, evidently, a contradiction in terms, given that I know some of these analyses and it would be impossible to forget them completely. I believe, however, that this exercise of purification, of return to the initial object, of trying to experience a first glance at these films is necessary. I did everything I could not to value these reflections and I myself hope to be ignored.

References

Andrade, Sérgio C. (Director). (2006). Ao correr do tempo [Motion picture]. Portugal: Ideias e Conteúdos.Baecque, A. & Parsi, J. (1999). Conversas com Manoel de Oliveira. (H. Cunha, Trans.). Porto: Campo das Letras. (Original work published 1996).Benjamin, W. (1999). Moscow. In M. Jennings, H. Ei- land & G. Smith (Eds.), Selected Writings, volume 2, 1927-1934 (pp.22-46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1927).Eisenstein, S. M. (Director). (1925). The Battleship Potemkin [Motion picture]. Soviet Union: Mosfilm.Eisenstein, S. (1951). The Birth of a Film. The Hudson Review, vol. 4, No. 2, 208-221. Retrieved December 28, 2008, from JSTOR database. doi: 10.2307/3856787Eisenstein, S. (1977). The Cinematographic Principle and the Ideogram. In J. Leyda (Ed. and Trans.), Film Form: Essays in Film Theory (pp.28-44). New York: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published 1929).Eisenstein, S. (1977). A Dialectic Approach to Film Form. In J. Leyda (Ed. and Trans.), Film Form: Es- says in Film Theory (pp.45-63). New York: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published 1929).Eisenstein, S. (1977). Through theatre to cinema. In J. Leyda (Ed. and Trans.), Film Form: Essays in Film Theory (pp.3-17). New York: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published 1934).Eisenstein, S.M., Pudovkin, V.I. & Alexandrov, G.V. (1977). Statement. In J. Leyda (Ed. and Trans.), Film Form: Essays in Film Theory (pp.257-260). New York: Harcourt Brace. (Original work published 1928).Oliveira, M. (Director). (1931). Douro, Working River [Motion picture]. Portugal.Pudovkin, V. (Director). (1926). Mother [Motion picture]. Soviet Union: Mezhrabpom-RussRuttmann, W. (Director). (1927). Berlin: Symphony of a Great City [Motion picture]. Germany: Fox-Europa-Film

Published
2009-05-05